ctfnote
  • /home/ret2basic.eth
  • Game Hacking
    • ✅C++
    • Ghidra
    • Cheat Engine
    • Proxy
    • DLL injection
    • Keygen
    • Aimbot
  • Web3 Security Research
    • 👑Web3 Security Research Trivia
    • ✅Solidity
      • ✅Mastering Ethereum
      • ✅Storage
      • ✅Memory
      • ✅Calldata
      • ✅ABI
    • ✅Foundry
      • ✅Introduction
      • ✅How to Write Basic Tests
      • ✅Set Soliditiy Compiler Version
      • ✅Remappings
      • ✅Auto Format Code
      • ✅Console Log
      • ✅Authentication
      • ✅Error
      • ✅Event
      • ✅Time
      • ✅Send ETH
      • ✅Signature
      • ✅Fork
      • ✅Mint 1 Million DAI on Mainnet Fork
      • ✅FFI
      • ✅Fuzz
      • ✅Invariant Testing - Part 1
      • Invariant Testing - Part 2
      • Invariant Testing - Part 3
      • Differential Test
    • ✅Secureum
      • ✅Epoch 0
        • ✅Slot 1: Ethereum 101
          • ✅Notes
          • ✅Ethereum Whitepaper
          • ✅Extra Study: What happens when you send 1 DAI
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 2: Solidity 101
          • ✅Notes
          • ✅OpenZeppelin ERC20
          • ✅OpenZeppelin ERC721
          • ✅OpenZeppelin Ownable
          • ✅OpenZeppelin Pausable
          • ✅OpenZeppelin ReentrancyGuard
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 3: Solidity 201
          • ✅Notes
          • ✅OpenZeppelin SafeERC20
          • ✅OpenZeppelin ERC-777
          • ✅OpenZeppelin ERC-1155
          • ✅OpenZeppelin ERC-3156
          • ✅OpenZeppelin - Proxy Upgrade Pattern
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 4: Pitfalls and Best Practices 101
          • ✅Notes
          • ✅Intro to Security First Development
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 5: Pitfalls and Best Practices 201
          • ✅Notes
          • So you want to use a price oracle
          • The Dangers of Surprising Code
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 6: Auditing Techniques & Tools 101
          • ✅Notes
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 7: Audit Findings 101
          • Notes
          • ✅Fei Protocol - ConsenSys
          • ✅Uniswap V3 - Trail of Bits
          • ✅Chainlink - Sigma Prime
          • ✅Opyn Gamma - OpenZeppelin
          • ✅Quiz
        • ✅Slot 8: Audit Findings 201
          • Notes
          • 1inch Liquidity - Consensus
          • Original Dollar - Trail of Bits
          • Synthetix EtherCollateral - Sigma Prime
          • Holdefi - OpenZeppelin
          • Quiz
      • ✅Epoch ∞
        • ✅RACE #4 - ERC20 Implementation
        • ✅RACE #5 - ERC1155 Implementation
        • ✅RACE #6 - ERC721 Application
        • ✅RACE #7 - Bored Ape
        • ✅RACE #8 - ERC721 Roles
        • ✅RACE #9 - Proxy
        • ✅RACE #10 - Test Cases
        • ✅RACE #11 - Staking
        • ✅RACE #12 - ERC20 Permit
        • ✅RACE #13 - ERC20 with Callback
        • ✅RACE #14 - Lending
        • ✅RACE #15 - DEX
        • ✅RACE #16 - Flash Loan
        • ✅RACE #17
    • DeFi
      • Glossary
        • TWAP vs. VWAP
        • Tranches
      • DeFi MOOC
        • Lecture 2: Introduction to Blockchain Technologies
        • Lecture 5: DEX
        • Lecture 6: Decentralized Lending
        • Lecture 10: Privacy on the Blockchain
        • Lecture 12: Practical Smart Contract Security
        • Lecture 13: DeFi Security
      • Uniswap V2
      • Compound V3
        • ✅Whitepaper
        • ✅Interacting with Compound
          • ✅Supply and Redeem
          • ✅Borrow and Repay
          • ✅Liquidation
          • ✅Long and Short
        • ✅Interest Model
        • CToken
      • Aave
      • Chainlink
        • ✅Getting Started
        • ✅Data Feeds
        • ✅VRF
      • Optimism
        • Bedrock
      • LayerZero
      • Opensea
        • Seaport
    • EVM
      • ✅Andreas Antonopoulos - The Ethereum Virtual Machine
      • ✅Program The Blockchain - Smart Contract Storage
      • ✅EVM Codes - EVM Playground for Opcodes
      • ✅Fvictorio - EVM Puzzles
      • ✅Daltyboy11 - More EVM Puzzles
      • ✅EVM Through Huff
      • Noxx - EVM Deep Dives
      • ✅Jordan McKinney - EVM Explained
      • Openzepplin - Deconstructing a Solidity Contract
      • Jeancvllr - EVM Assembly
      • Peter Robinson - Solidity to Bytecode, Memory & Storage
      • Marek Kirejczyk - Ethereum Under The Hood
      • ✅Official Solidity Docs
      • Dissecting EVM using go-ethereum Eth client implementation - deliriusz.eth
    • Vulnerabilities
      • Rounding Issues
        • Kyberswap
      • Bridges
      • Governance / Voting Escrows
      • Bizzare Bug Classes
        • TIME - ERC2771Context + Multicall calldata manipulation
    • Fancy Topics
      • Vulnerabilities SoK
        • ✅Demystifying Exploitable Bugs in Smart Contracts
        • Blockchain Hacking Techniques 2022 Top 10 - Todo
      • yAcademy
        • Proxies
          • yAcademy - Proxy Basics
          • yAcademy - Proxies Deep Dive
          • yAcademy - Security Guide to Proxy Vulns
        • defi-fork-bugs
      • Spearbit
        • ✅Community Workshop: Riley Holterhus
        • Economic Security with fmrmf
        • Numerical Analysis for DeFi Audits: A TWAMM Case Study by Kurt Barry
  • Red Teaming
    • ✅Enumeration
      • Service Enumeration
        • SMTP (Port 25)
        • Samba (Port 139, 445)
        • SNMP (Port 161,162,10161,10162)
        • rsync (Port 873)
        • NFS (Port 2049)
        • Apache JServ Protocol (Port 8081)
        • NetBIOS
      • Nmap
      • Gobuster / Feroxbuster / FUFF / Wfuzz
      • Drupal
    • ✅Exploitation
      • Public Exploits
      • PHP Webshells
      • Reverse Shell
      • TTY
      • File Transfer
      • Metasploit
      • Password Spray
    • ✅Buffer Overflow
      • Step 0: Spiking (Optional)
      • Step 1: Fuzzing
      • Step 2: Finding the Offset
      • Step 3: Overwriting the EIP
      • Step 4: Finding Bad Characters
      • Step 5: Finding the Right Module
      • Step 6: Generating Shellcode and Gaining Root
    • ✅Privilege Escalation
      • Linux Privilege Escalation
        • Linux Permissions
        • Manual Enumeration
        • Automated Tools
        • Kernel Exploits
        • Passwords and File Permissions
        • SSH Keys
        • Sudo
        • SUID
        • Capabilities
        • Cron Jobs
        • NFS Root Squashing
        • Docker
        • GNU C Library
        • Exim
        • Linux Privilege Escalation Course Capstone
      • Windows Privilege Escalation
        • Manual Enumeration
        • Automated Tools
        • Kernel Exploits
        • Passwords and Port Forwarding
        • WSL
        • Token Impersonation and Potato Attacks
        • Meterpreter getsystem
        • Runas
        • UAC Bypass
        • Registry
        • Executable Files
        • Startup Applications
        • DLL Hijacking
        • Service Permissions (Paths)
        • CVE-2019-1388
        • HiveNightmare
        • Bypass Space Filter
    • ✅Post Exploitation
      • Linux Post Exploitation
        • Add a User
        • SSH Key
      • Windows Post Exploitation
        • windows-resources
        • Add a User
        • RDP
    • ✅Pivoting
      • Windows: Chisel
      • Linux: sshuttle
    • Active Directory (AD)
      • Initial Compromise
        • HTA Phishing
        • VBA Macro Phishing
        • LLMNR Poisoning
        • SMB Relay
        • GPP / cPassword
      • Domain Enumeration
        • Manual Enumeration
        • PowerView
        • BloodHound
      • Lateral Movement
        • PsExec
        • WMI
        • Runas
        • Pass the Hash
        • Overpass the Hash
        • Pass the Ticket
      • Kerberos
        • Kerberoast
        • AS-REP Roast
      • MS SQL Server
    • Command & Control (C2)
      • Cobalt Strike
        • Bypassing Defences
          • Artifact Kit
          • Resource Kit
          • AMSI Bypass
          • PowerPick
        • Extending Cobalt Strike
          • Elevate Kit
          • Malleable C2 Profile
      • Metasploit
        • Payloads
        • Post Exploitation
        • Automation
      • C2 Development
    • Malware Development
      • "Hot Dropper"
      • PE Format
        • Overview
      • Process Injection
      • Reflective DLL
      • x86 <=> x64
      • Hooking
      • VeraCry
      • Offensive C#
      • AV Evasion
        • AV Evasion with C# and PowerShell
        • AMSI Bypass
  • Cryptography
    • Hash Functions
    • MAC
    • AES
      • Byte at a Time
      • CBC CCA
      • CBC Bit Flipping
      • CBC Padding Oracle
    • Diffie-Hellman
    • RSA
      • Prime Factors
      • Multiple Ciphertexts
      • Low Public Exponent
      • Low Private Exponent
    • ECC
    • Digital Signature
    • JWT
    • PRNG
    • SSL/TLS
    • Research
      • ✅Lattice-based Cryptography (Lattice)
      • Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC)
      • Oblivious Transfer (OT)
      • Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC)
      • Learning with Error (LWE)
      • Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE)
      • Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)
      • Oblivious RAM (ORAM)
  • Computer Science
    • Linux
      • Setup
      • curl
      • Hard Link vs. Symlink
      • Man Page
      • /dev/null
    • Python
      • New Features
      • Operators, Expressions, and Data Manipulation
      • Program Structure and Control Flow
      • Objects, Types, and Protocols
      • Functions 101
      • Generators
      • Classes and Object-Oriented Programming
      • Memory Management
      • Concurrency and Parallelism
        • Multithreading and Thread Safety
        • Asynchronization
        • Multiprocessing
        • Global Interpreter Lock (GIL)
      • Built-in Functions and Standard Library
        • import collections
        • import itertools
        • import sys
        • import re
        • import pickle
        • import json
      • Third-party Library
        • from pwn import *
        • import requests
        • from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
        • from scapy.all import *
        • py2exe
    • HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and React
      • HTML
      • CSS
      • JavaScript
        • var vs. let
        • Objects
        • Arrays
        • Functions
        • Modules
        • Asynchronous JavaScript
      • React
    • Data Structures and Algorithms
      • Binary Search
    • The Linux Programming Interface
      • Processes
        • Memory Allocation
        • The Process API
        • Process Creation
        • Process Termination
        • Monitoring Child Processes
        • Program Execution
      • Signals
      • Threads
        • Thread Synchronization
        • Thread Safety and Pre-Thread Storage
      • IPC
        • Pipes and FIFOs
        • Memory Mappings
        • Virtual Memory Operations
      • Sockets
    • Computer Systems
      • Hexadecimal
      • Signedness
      • Registers
      • Instructions
      • Syscall
      • Process Memory
      • Stack Frame
      • Preemptive Multitasking
      • IPC
      • Threads
    • Databases
      • MySQL
        • Basic Syntax
        • Data Types
        • Modifying Tables
        • Duplicating and Deleting
        • SELECT
        • Transaction
      • GraphQL
    • Distributed Systems
      • Introduction
        • What is a Distributed System?
        • Design Goals
        • Scaling Techniques
        • Types of Distributed Systems
      • Architecture
        • System Architectures
        • Example Architectures
      • Communication
        • Foundations
        • Remote Procedure Call
        • Message-oriented Communication
      • Coordination
        • Clock Synchronization
        • Logical Clock
      • Consistency and Replication
        • Introduction
        • Data-centric Consistency
        • Client-centric Consistency
    • Static Analysis
      • Intermediate Representation
      • Data Flow Analysis
      • Interprocedural Analysis
      • Pointer Analysis
      • Static Analysis for Security
      • Datalog-Based Program Analysis
      • Soundness and Soundiness
      • CFL-Reachability and IFDS
  • Web
    • ✅Prerequisites
      • OWASP Top 10
        • 1. Broken Access Control
        • 2. Cryptographic Failures
        • 3. Injection
        • 4. Insecure Design
        • 5. Security Misconfiguration
        • 6. Vulnerable and Outdated Components
        • 7. Identification and Authentication Failures
        • 8. Software and Data Integrity Failures
        • 9. Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
        • 10. SSRF
      • HTTP
        • HTTP Status Codes
        • HTTP Headers
      • Burp Suite
        • Burp Intruder
        • Burp Extender
        • Burp Collaborator
      • Information Gathering
        • DNS
        • Git
        • Editor
        • Server
      • Bug Bounty Report Writing
    • File Upload
      • Webshell
      • IIS, Nginx, and Apache Vulnerabilities
      • .htaccess (Apache) / web.config (IIS)
      • Alternate Data Stream
      • Code Review: bWAPP Unrestricted File Upload
    • SQL Injection (SQLi)
      • Cheat Sheet
      • UNION Attacks
      • Examining the Database
      • Blind SQL Injection
      • WAF Bypass
      • Out-Of-Band (OOB)
      • Webshell and UDF
      • sqlmap
        • Code Review: Initialization
        • Code Review: tamper
    • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
      • Cheat Sheet
      • Reflected XSS
      • Stored XSS
      • DOM-Based XSS
      • XSS Contexts
      • CSP
    • CSRF and SSRF
      • Client-Side Request Forgery (CSRF)
        • XSS vs. CSRF
        • CSRF Tokens and SameSite Cookies
      • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
        • Attacks
        • Bypassing Restrictions
        • SSRF + Redis
    • XML External Entities (XXE)
    • Insecure Deserialization
      • Python Deserialization
      • PHP Deserialization
      • Java Deserialization
        • Shiro
        • FastJSON
        • WebLogic
    • HTTP Request Smuggling
    • OS Command Injection
      • Whitespace Bypass
      • Blacklist Bypass
      • Blind OS Command Injection
      • Lab 1: HITCON 2015 BabyFirst
      • Lab 2: HITCON 2017 BabyFirst Revenge
      • Lab 3: HITCON 2017 BabyFirst Revenge v2
    • ✅Directory Traversal
    • HTTP Parameter Pollution
    • Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI)
    • LDAP Injection
    • Redis
      • Authentication
      • RCE
      • Mitigations
  • Pwn
    • Linux Exploitation
      • Protections
      • Shellcoding
        • Calling Convention
        • Null-free
        • Reverse Shell
        • ORW
      • ROP
        • Stack Alignment
        • ret2text
        • ret2syscall
        • ret2libc
        • ret2csu
        • BROP
        • SROP
        • Stack Pivot
      • ptmalloc
        • chunks
        • malloc() and free()
        • bins
        • tcache
      • UAF
      • Race Conditions
        • TOCTTOU
        • Dirty Cow
        • Meltdown
        • Spectre
      • Kernel
      • Appendix: Tools
        • socat
        • LibcSearcher-ng
        • OneGadget
    • Windows Exploitation
      • Classic
      • SEH
      • Egghunting
      • Unicode
      • Shellcoding
      • ROP
      • Appendix: Tools
        • ImmunityDbg
        • Mona.py
    • Fuzzing
      • AFL++
        • Quickstart
        • Instrumentation
        • ASAN
        • Code Coverage
        • Dictionary
        • Parallelization
        • Partial Instrumentation
        • QEMU Mode
        • afl-libprotobuf-mutator
      • WinAFL
      • Fuzzilli
  • Reverse
    • Bytecode
      • Python Bytecode
    • 👑Z3 solver
    • angr
      • angr Template
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • What is HTTP Request Smuggling?
  • Types of HTTP Request Smuggling
  • CL.TE
  • TE.CL
  • TE.TE
  • Defense
  • Reference

Was this helpful?

  1. Web

HTTP Request Smuggling

PreviousWebLogicNextOS Command Injection

Last updated 3 years ago

Was this helpful?

What is HTTP Request Smuggling?

HTTP request smuggling is a technique for interfering with the way a web site processes sequences of HTTP requests that are received from one or more users. Request smuggling vulnerabilities are often critical in nature, allowing an attacker to bypass security controls, gain unauthorized access to sensitive data, and directly compromise other application users.

Today's web applications frequently employ chains of HTTP servers between users and the ultimate application logic. Users send requests to a front-end server (sometimes called a load balancer or reverse proxy) and this server forwards requests to one or more back-end servers. This type of architecture is increasingly common, and in some cases unavoidable, in modern cloud-based applications.

When the front-end server forwards HTTP requests to a back-end server, it typically sends several requests over the same back-end network connection, because this is much more efficient and performant. The protocol is very simple: HTTP requests are sent one after another, and the receiving server parses the HTTP request headers to determine where one request ends and the next one begins:

In this situation, it is crucial that the front-end and back-end systems agree about the boundaries between requests. Otherwise, an attacker might be able to send an ambiguous request that gets interpreted differently by the front-end and back-end systems:

Here, the attacker causes part of their front-end request to be interpreted by the back-end server as the start of the next request. It is effectively prepended to the next request, and so can interfere with the way the application processes that request. This is a request smuggling attack, and it can have devastating results.

Most HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise because the HTTP specification provides two different ways to specify where a request ends: the Content-Length header and the Transfer-Encoding header.

The Content-Length header is straightforward: it specifies the length of the message body in bytes. For example:

POST /search HTTP/1.1
Host: normal-website.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 11

q=smuggling

The Transfer-Encoding header can be used to specify that the message body uses chunked encoding. This means that the message body contains one or more chunks of data. Each chunk consists of the chunk size in bytes (expressed in hexadecimal), followed by a newline, followed by the chunk contents. The message is terminated with a chunk of size zero. For example:

POST /search HTTP/1.1
Host: normal-website.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

b
q=smuggling
0

Since the HTTP specification provides two different methods for specifying the length of HTTP messages, it is possible for a single message to use both methods at once, such that they conflict with each other. The HTTP specification attempts to prevent this problem by stating that if both the Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers are present, then the Content-Length header should be ignored. This might be sufficient to avoid ambiguity when only a single server is in play, but not when two or more servers are chained together. In this situation, problems can arise for two reasons:

  • Some servers do not support the Transfer-Encoding header in requests.

  • Some servers that do support the Transfer-Encoding header can be induced not to process it if the header is obfuscated in some way.

If the front-end and back-end servers behave differently in relation to the (possibly obfuscated) Transfer-Encoding header, then they might disagree about the boundaries between successive requests, leading to request smuggling vulnerabilities.

Types of HTTP Request Smuggling

Request smuggling attacks involve placing both the Content-Length header and the Transfer-Encoding header into a single HTTP request and manipulating these so that the front-end and back-end servers process the request differently. The exact way in which this is done depends on the behavior of the two servers:

  • CL.TE: the front-end server uses the Content-Length header and the back-end server uses the Transfer-Encoding header.

  • TE.CL: the front-end server uses the Transfer-Encoding header and the back-end server uses the Content-Length header.

  • TE.TE: the front-end and back-end servers both support the Transfer-Encoding header, but one of the servers can be induced not to process it by obfuscating the header in some way.

CL.TE

Here, the front-end server uses the Content-Length header and the back-end server uses the Transfer-Encoding header. We can perform a simple HTTP request smuggling attack as follows:

POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable-website.com
Content-Length: 13
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

0

SMUGGLED

The front-end server processes the Content-Length header and determines that the request body is 13 bytes long, up to the end of SMUGGLED. This request is forwarded on to the back-end server.

The back-end server processes the Transfer-Encoding header, and so treats the message body as using chunked encoding. It processes the first chunk, which is stated to be zero length, and so is treated as terminating the request. The following bytes, SMUGGLED, are left unprocessed, and the back-end server will treat these as being the start of the next request in the sequence.

TE.CL

Here, the front-end server uses the Transfer-Encoding header and the back-end server uses the Content-Length header. We can perform a simple HTTP request smuggling attack as follows:

POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable-website.com
Content-Length: 3
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

8
SMUGGLED
0

To send this request using Burp Repeater, you will first need to go to the Repeater menu and ensure that the "Update Content-Length" option is unchecked.

You need to include the trailing sequence \r\n\r\n following the final 0.

The front-end server processes the Transfer-Encoding header, and so treats the message body as using chunked encoding. It processes the first chunk, which is stated to be 8 bytes long, up to the start of the line following SMUGGLED. It processes the second chunk, which is stated to be zero length, and so is treated as terminating the request. This request is forwarded on to the back-end server.

The back-end server processes the Content-Length header and determines that the request body is 3 bytes long, up to the start of the line following 8. The following bytes, starting with SMUGGLED, are left unprocessed, and the back-end server will treat these as being the start of the next request in the sequence.

TE.TE

Here, the front-end and back-end servers both support the Transfer-Encoding header, but one of the servers can be induced not to process it by obfuscating the header in some way.

There are potentially endless ways to obfuscate the Transfer-Encoding header. For example:

Transfer-Encoding: xchunked

Transfer-Encoding : chunked

Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Transfer-Encoding: x

Transfer-Encoding:[tab]chunked

[space]Transfer-Encoding: chunked

X: X[\n]Transfer-Encoding: chunked

Transfer-Encoding
: chunked

Each of these techniques involves a subtle departure from the HTTP specification. Real-world code that implements a protocol specification rarely adheres to it with absolute precision, and it is common for different implementations to tolerate different variations from the specification. To uncover a TE.TE vulnerability, it is necessary to find some variation of the Transfer-Encoding header such that only one of the front-end or back-end servers processes it, while the other server ignores it.

Depending on whether it is the front-end or the back-end server that can be induced not to process the obfuscated Transfer-Encoding header, the remainder of the attack will take the same form as for the CL.TE or TE.CL vulnerabilities already described.

Defense

HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise in situations where the front-end server and back-end server use different mechanisms for determining the boundaries between requests. This may be due to discrepancies between whether HTTP/1 servers use the Content-Length header or chunked transfer encoding to determine where each request ends. In HTTP/2 environments, the common practice of downgrading HTTP/2 requests for the back-end is also fraught with issues and enables or simplifies a number of additional attacks.

To prevent HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities, we recommend taking the following general steps:

  • Use HTTP/2 end to end and disable HTTP downgrading if possible. HTTP/2 uses a robust mechanism for determining the length of requests and, when used end to end, is inherently protected against request smuggling. If you can't avoid HTTP downgrading, make sure you validate the rewritten request against the HTTP/1.1 specification. For example, reject requests that contain newlines in the headers, colons in header names, and spaces in the request method.

  • Make the front-end server normalize ambiguous requests and make the back-end server reject any that are still ambiguous, closing the TCP connection in the process.

Reference

As we've demonstrated in the learning materials, disabling reuse of back-end connections will help to mitigate certain kinds of attack, but this still doesn't protect you from attacks.

request tunnelling
What is HTTP request smuggling? Tutorial & Examples | Web Security AcademyWebSecAcademy
HTTP request smuggling - Web Security Academy
Logo
HTTP Request Smuggling
Front-end vs. Back-end
Ambiguous request